Radeon RX 6650M XT vs UHD Graphics 605

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 605 610 615 617 620 630 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700S 6800S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 605 and Radeon RX 6650M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 605
2017
5 Watt
1.09

6650M XT outperforms Graphics 605 by a whopping 3464% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1143134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.7524.88
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 December 2017 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442048
Core clock speed200 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate13.50309.2
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs18128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 605 1.09
RX 6650M XT 38.85
+3464%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 605 453
RX 6650M XT 16081
+3450%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−3233%
400−450
+3233%
1440p24
−3442%
850−900
+3442%
4K15
−3233%
500−550
+3233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12400%
120−130
+12400%
Fortnite 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−12200%
120−130
+12200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
Valorant 30−35
−632%
220−230
+632%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 130−140
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−969%
270−280
+969%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Dota 2 7
−1957%
140−150
+1957%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12400%
120−130
+12400%
Fortnite 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−12200%
120−130
+12200%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9200%
90−95
+9200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1886%
130−140
+1886%
Valorant 30−35
−632%
220−230
+632%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 130−140
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Dota 2 7
−1957%
140−150
+1957%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12400%
120−130
+12400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1
−13800%
130−140
+13800%
Valorant 30−35
−632%
220−230
+632%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3200%
95−100
+3200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−3800%
270−280
+3800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 3−4
−8533%
250−260
+8533%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Far Cry 5 0−1 95−100
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3650%
75−80
+3650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−10200%
100−110
+10200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−467%
85−90
+467%
Valorant 7−8
−3314%
230−240
+3314%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 605 and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 3233% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M XT is 3442% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M XT is 3233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 13800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 38 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.09 38.85
Recency 11 December 2017 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 120 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 2300% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 3464% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
GT 525M GeForce GT 525M
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RTX 3080 Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
HD 8570M Radeon HD 8570M
Tesla M10 NVIDIA Tesla M10
vs
Radeon 890M Radeon 890M
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
ATI HD 4870 HD 4870
TITAN V NVIDIA TITAN V
vs
GTX 285 GTX 285
Tesla P100 SXM2 NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
vs
T600 T600
UHD Graphics 605 Intel UHD Graphics 605
vs
A30 PCIe A30 PCIe
GTX 1060 5 GB NVIDIA GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 1650 Ti Max-Q
GTX 1060 5 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
vs
RX 7400 RX 7400
RX Vega M GH AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
vs
Pro 5500M Pro 5500M
RX Vega M GL AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
GTX 950 GTX 950
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 950 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 605 or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.