Radeon RX 5700 vs UHD Graphics 605

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 605 with Radeon RX 5700, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 605
2017
5 Watt
1.18

RX 5700 outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by a whopping 3069% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1081133
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.86
Power efficiency16.1714.24
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1442304
Core clock speed200 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors189 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate13.50248.4
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPS7.949 TFLOPS
ROPs364
TMUs18144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data268 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

UHD Graphics 605 1.18
RX 5700 37.40
+3069%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 605 453
RX 5700 14376
+3074%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 605 648
RX 5700 31470
+4756%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 605 2162
RX 5700 91993
+4155%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics 605 454
RX 5700 23746
+5130%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 605 3360
RX 5700 132911
+3856%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics 605 45008
RX 5700 489113
+987%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−883%
118
+883%
1440p24
−196%
71
+196%
4K15
−193%
44
+193%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.96
1440pno data4.92
4Kno data7.93

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 3−4
−5200%
159
+5200%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−925%
82
+925%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−3933%
121
+3933%
Battlefield 5 0−1 115
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−738%
67
+738%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75
+2400%
Fortnite 2−3
−8200%
166
+8200%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2100%
132
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1578%
151
+1578%
Valorant 30−35
−791%
294
+791%
Atomic Heart 3−4
−2233%
70
+2233%
Battlefield 5 0−1 105
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−613%
57
+613%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−965%
270−280
+965%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%
Dota 2 7
−2129%
156
+2129%
Fortnite 2−3
−6900%
140
+6900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130
+2067%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 137
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8600%
87
+8600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1500%
144
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2840%
147
+2840%
Valorant 30−35
−782%
291
+782%
Battlefield 5 0−1 97
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−525%
50
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1833%
58
+1833%
Dota 2 7
−1986%
146
+1986%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1867%
118
+1867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1444%
139
+1444%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1
−9000%
91
+9000%
Valorant 30−35
−385%
160
+385%
Fortnite 2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−3883%
230−240
+3883%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%
Valorant 3−4
−9133%
277
+9133%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3333%
103
+3333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3050%
60−65
+3050%
Fortnite 2−3
−3750%
77
+3750%
Atomic Heart 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−380%
72
+380%
Valorant 6−7
−3750%
231
+3750%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 15
Dota 2 0−1 100
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2250%
47
+2250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Fortnite 2−3
−1850%
39
+1850%
Far Cry 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 51
+0%
51
+0%
Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 64
+0%
64
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Battlefield 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+0%
70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 605 and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 883% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 196% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 193% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 is 9200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is ahead in 43 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 37.40
Recency 11 December 2017 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 180 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 3500% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has a 3069.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6
840 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
1920 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 605 or Radeon RX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.