Quadro P4200 vs UHD Graphics 600

Place in the ranking	1134	217
Place by popularity	59	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.00	17.40
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Gemini Lake GT1	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 December 2017 (7 years ago)	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	2304
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1227 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1647 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	5 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	237.2
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	64
TMUs	12	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	Ring Bus	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	-	+
Quick Sync	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 600 0.87

Quadro P4200 25.23
+2800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 600 334

Quadro P4200 10654
+3090%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 −2800%	290−300 +2800%
1440p	1 −2600%	27−30 +2600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −571%	45−50 +571%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1175%	50−55 +1175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −571%	45−50 +571%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1175%	50−55 +1175%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −1750%	110−120 +1750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −571%	45−50 +571%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1175%	50−55 +1175%
Dota 2	2 −4250%	85−90 +4250%
Far Cry 5	4 −1825%	75−80 +1825%
Fortnite	2−3 −6200%	120−130 +6200%
Forza Horizon 4	6 −1750%	110−120 +1750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	11 −1336%	150−160 +1336%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1267%	80−85 +1267%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1133%	250−260 +1133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −571%	45−50 +571%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1175%	50−55 +1175%
Dota 2	7 −1143%	85−90 +1143%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −756%	75−80 +756%
Forza Horizon 4	4 −2675%	110−120 +2675%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1336%	150−160 +1336%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −3400%	170−180 +3400%
World of Tanks	4−5 −4075%	160−170 +4075%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1380%	70−75 +1380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −850%	35−40 +850%
Valorant	5−6 −1260%	65−70 +1260%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −3750%	75−80 +3750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2500%	24−27 +2500%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Dota 2	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Valorant	1−2 −3200%	30−35 +3200%