Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 vs UHD Graphics 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1089not rated
Place by popularity28not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.65no data
ArchitectureGen. 9 Gemini Lake (2017)Gen. 4 (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGemini LakePineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)10 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$274 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores122
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed700 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors189 million123 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.000no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 600 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data

Memory typeDDR4 / LPDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus width64/128 Bitno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 600 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 3069 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 329 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.