A100 PCIe 40 GB vs RTX A2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation85.77no data
Power efficiency35.42no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106GA100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 August 2021 (3 years ago)22 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33286912
Core clock speed562 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate124.8609.1
Floating-point processing power7.987 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs48160
TMUs104432
Tensor Cores104432
Ray Tracing Cores26no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length167 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB40 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1,555 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.8N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.68.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 August 2021 22 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 250 Watt

RTX A2000 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe 40 GB, on the other hand, has a 566.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX A2000 and A100 PCIe 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 40 GB
A100 PCIe 40 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 567 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 8 votes

Rate A100 PCIe 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.