GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs UHD Graphics 600
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 600 and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by a whopping 1329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1173 | 438 |
| Place by popularity | 67 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 12.05 | 11.48 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | GP107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 February 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1366 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | 1442 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 7.800 | 69.22 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1248 TFLOPS | 2.215 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 24 |
| TMUs | 12 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1752 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 84.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10
−1300%
| 140−150
+1300%
|
| 1440p | 1
−1300%
| 14−16
+1300%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Valorant | 13
−1285%
|
180−190
+1285%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−1264%
|
300−310
+1264%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Dota 2 | 7
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Valorant | 11
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Dota 2 | 7
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−1279%
|
400−450
+1279%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−1275%
|
220−230
+1275%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 600 and GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB compete in popular games:
- GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is 1300% faster in 1080p
- GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is 1300% faster in 1440p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.79 | 11.29 |
| Recency | 11 December 2017 | 1 February 2019 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 75 Watt |
UHD Graphics 600 has 1400% lower power consumption.
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB, on the other hand, has a 1329.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 600 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
