ATI Radeon X1600 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) with Radeon X1600, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms ATI X1600 by a whopping 1692% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 896 | 1485 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.34 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) | Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | Alder Lake Xe | RV516 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 635 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 750 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 105 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 27 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 2.540 |
| ROPs | no data | 4 |
| TMUs | no data | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 800 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 12.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | no data | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | no data | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 7−8 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 7 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
+2100%
|
2−3
−2100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 6 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 5 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 6 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 40−45
+1900%
|
2−3
−1900%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 10−11 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+2000%
|
1−2
−2000%
|
| Valorant | 16−18 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| God of War | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.15 | 0.12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 90 nm |
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has a 1691.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
