GRID M60-4A vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) with GRID M60-4A, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.16

M60-4A outperforms Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking917645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.00
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeGM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores242048
Core clock speed450 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−163%
21−24
+163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 7
−157%
18−20
+157%
Fortnite 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Valorant 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−150%
110−120
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 6
−167%
16−18
+167%
Fortnite 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Grand Theft Auto V 5
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Metro Exodus 5
−140%
12−14
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−163%
21−24
+163%
Valorant 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry 5 6
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−150%
10−11
+150%
Valorant 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Valorant 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Valorant 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and GRID M60-4A compete in popular games:

  • GRID M60-4A is 163% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 5.86
Recency 3 January 2023 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M60-4A, on the other hand, has a 171.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The GRID M60-4A is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook graphics card while GRID M60-4A is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
NVIDIA GRID M60-4A
GRID M60-4A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 142 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID M60-4A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) or GRID M60-4A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.