Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.95no data
Power efficiency9.47no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (9 years ago)13 March 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841024
Core clock speed1417 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate342.959.20
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs22464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 13 March 2015
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

Titan X Pascal has an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

R9 270 1024SP, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and Radeon R9 270 1024SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3007 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 1024SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Radeon R9 270 1024SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.