Radeon RX 6600 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Radeon RX 6600, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.04

RX 6600 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking443109
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.63
Power efficiencyno data21.83
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)13 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speedno data1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2491 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data132 Watt
Texture fill rateno data279.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.928 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 10.04
RX 6600 39.26
+291%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
RX 6600 23366
+367%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−326%
115
+326%
1440p14−16
−321%
59
+321%
4K8−9
−300%
32
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−246%
80−85
+246%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−306%
120−130
+306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−246%
95−100
+246%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−189%
190−200
+189%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−241%
90−95
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−347%
140−150
+347%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−246%
80−85
+246%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−306%
120−130
+306%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−246%
95−100
+246%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−189%
190−200
+189%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−202%
160−170
+202%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−306%
120−130
+306%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−241%
90−95
+241%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−469%
182
+469%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−212%
80−85
+212%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−246%
80−85
+246%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−189%
190−200
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−246%
90
+246%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−268%
70−75
+268%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−400%
220−230
+400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−333%
180−190
+333%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−529%
44
+529%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−350%
50−55
+350%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
+0%
113
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Hitman 3 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Hitman 3 95
+0%
95
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+0%
59
+0%
Hitman 3 86
+0%
86
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
+0%
142
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 157
+0%
157
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 58
+0%
58
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Hitman 3 54
+0%
54
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 36
+0%
36
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 326% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 321% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 is 529% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is ahead in 33 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 39 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.04 39.26
Recency 15 August 2020 13 October 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

RX 6600 has a 291% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 8825 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.