Radeon R7 M260X vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.85
+285%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon R7 M260X by a whopping 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking420787
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeMars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)7 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Compute unitsno data6
Core clock speedno data715 MHz
Boost clock speedno data715 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data17.16
Floating-point performanceno data549.1 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 M260X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data+
PowerTuneno data+
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data2.0
Mantleno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.85
+285%
R7 M260X 2.56

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon R7 M260X by 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+258%
R7 M260X 1396

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon R7 M260X by 258% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
+282%
17
−282%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+133%
18−20
−133%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+300%
5−6
−300%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and R7 M260X compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 282% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 933% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 surpassed R7 M260X in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.85 2.56
Recency 15 August 2020 7 January 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M260X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
Radeon R7 M260X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 21 vote

Rate Radeon R7 M260X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.