Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Place in the ranking	455	945
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	736
Core clock speed	no data	655 / 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	40 nm

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

no data

medium sized

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR4	no data
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1800 MHz
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

DirectX 12_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	130−140 +465%	23 −465%
Full HD	95−100 +494%	16 −494%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +583%	6−7 −583%
Fortnite	55−60 +544%	9−10 −544%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +542%	12−14 −542%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Valorant	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Dota 2	35−40 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +242%	12−14 −242%
Fortnite	55−60 +625%	8−9 −625%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +353%	16−18 −353%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +275%	8−9 −275%
Valorant	35−40 +517%	6−7 −517%
World of Tanks	140−150 +225%	44 −225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +1500%	2−3 −1500%
Dota 2	35−40 +1100%	3−4 −1100%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +242%	12−14 −242%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 +353%	16−18 −353%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +500%	5−6 −500%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

55−60

+544%

9−10
−544%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Valorant	24−27 +525%	4−5 −525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +633%	3−4 −633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27

+525%

4−5
−525%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	5−6	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Valorant	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Dota 2	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

10−11
+900%

1−2

−900%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
World of Tanks	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Valorant	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 465% faster in 900p
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 494% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 27 tests (56%)
there's a draw in 21 test (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.95	1.67
Recency	15 August 2020	15 May 2012
Chip lithography	10 nm	40 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 495.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.