P106-100 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.18

P106-100 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking508367
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.14
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961280
Core clock speedno data1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Valorant 90−95
−64.8%
150−160
+64.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−67.8%
240−250
+67.8%
Dota 2 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Valorant 90−95
−64.8%
150−160
+64.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Dota 2 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−66.7%
95−100
+66.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−66.7%
120−130
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 100−110
−63.5%
170−180
+63.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Escape from Tarkov 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Dota 2 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.18 15.70
Recency 15 August 2020 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

P106-100, on the other hand, has a 71% higher aggregate performance score.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 340 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.