P106-090 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.86
+62.7%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms P106-090 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking420553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.56
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGP106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)31 July 2017 (6 years ago)
Current priceno data$26

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
Core clock speedno data1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.49
Floating-point performanceno data2,352 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and P106-090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data8008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+72.2%
18−20
−72.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.86 6.06
Recency 15 August 2020 31 July 2017
Chip lithography 10 nm 16 nm

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while P106-090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 48 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.