GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 496 | 9 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 54.32 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.32 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | AD103 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 8 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $799 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 8448 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 2340 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2610 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 285 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 689.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 44.1 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 96 |
| TMUs | no data | 264 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 264 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 66 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 310 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1313 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 672.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 24−27
−833%
| 224
+833%
|
| 1440p | 16−18
−819%
| 147
+819%
|
| 4K | 10−12
−790%
| 89
+790%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 3.57 |
| 1440p | no data | 5.44 |
| 4K | no data | 8.98 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−371%
|
190−200
+371%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−577%
|
203
+577%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−439%
|
300−350
+439%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−693%
|
300−350
+693%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−430%
|
170−180
+430%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−428%
|
450−500
+428%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−371%
|
190−200
+371%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
−95.8%
|
270−280
+95.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−709%
|
550−600
+709%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−557%
|
197
+557%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−439%
|
300−350
+439%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−693%
|
300−350
+693%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−412%
|
174
+412%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−989%
|
196
+989%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−430%
|
170−180
+430%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−1692%
|
430
+1692%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−428%
|
450−500
+428%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−371%
|
190−200
+371%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−709%
|
550−600
+709%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
−527%
|
188
+527%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−693%
|
300−350
+693%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
−430%
|
170−180
+430%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−775%
|
210
+775%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
−439%
|
300−350
+439%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−627%
|
500−550
+627%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−1092%
|
155
+1092%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
−1210%
|
131
+1210%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−371%
|
450−500
+371%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−791%
|
190−200
+791%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−884%
|
187
+884%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−1182%
|
280−290
+1182%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20
−695%
|
150−160
+695%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−810%
|
182
+810%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1580%
|
84
+1580%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−1790%
|
180−190
+1790%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−590%
|
300−350
+590%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−1136%
|
130−140
+1136%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
−724%
|
280−290
+724%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−1222%
|
119
+1222%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−1553%
|
240−250
+1553%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−967%
|
95−100
+967%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
−778%
|
75−80
+778%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 197
+0%
|
197
+0%
|
| God of War | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 196
+0%
|
196
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
| God of War | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 172
+0%
|
172
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 220−230
+0%
|
220−230
+0%
|
| God of War | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 158
+0%
|
158
+0%
|
| God of War | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
| Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
| God of War | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 159
+0%
|
159
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50
+0%
|
50
+0%
|
| God of War | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 833% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 819% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 790% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 1790% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 39 tests (63%)
- there's a draw in 23 tests (37%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.13 | 75.91 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 8 January 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 731.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
