Radeon RX 6700 vs Tegra 3 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated88
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.67
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTegra 3Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 November 2011 (13 years ago)9 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed416 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed520 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors10 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160352.8
Floating-point processing powerno data11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs8144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2011 9 June 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 175 Watt

Tegra 3 GPU has 775% lower power consumption.

RX 6700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 3 GPU and Radeon RX 6700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 3 GPU is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU
Tegra 3 GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Tegra 3 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1505 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 3 GPU or Radeon RX 6700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.