GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce GTX 485M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020
9.26
+11%

Tiger Lake-U Graphics G7 outperforms 485M SLI by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.41
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeN11E-GTX-A1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)6 January 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
Core clock speedno data575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2x2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Shared memory+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_111

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95−100
+6.7%
89
−6.7%
Full HD110−120
+6.8%
103
−6.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Fortnite 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Valorant 90−95
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+8.4%
130−140
−8.4%
Dota 2 65−70
+7.9%
60−65
−7.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Fortnite 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Valorant 90−95
+7.1%
85−90
−7.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
Dota 2 65−70
+7.9%
60−65
−7.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 100−110
+10.6%
90−95
−10.6%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+21.1%
18−20
−21.1%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 45−50
+11.4%
40−45
−11.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and GTX 485M SLI compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 7% faster in 900p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 7% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 performs better in 42 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.26 8.34
Recency 15 August 2020 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has a 11% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 485M SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 or GeForce GTX 485M SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.