Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Tesla X2090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated635
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.05
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGF110DG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed651 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6679.20
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs4824
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthMXM ModuleIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 25 Watt

Tesla X2090 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Iris Xe Graphics MAX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2090 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla X2090 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 220 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla X2090 or Iris Xe Graphics MAX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.