Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Tesla V100 FHHL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.81
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Vega 12
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 March 2018 (8 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed937 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed1290 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate412.876.16
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32064
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache10 MB256 KB
L2 Cache6 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed810 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth829.4 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2018 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Tesla V100 FHHL has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 FHHL and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 FHHL is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 12 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla V100 FHHL or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.