Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 100HX-210 Quadro GV100 PG503-216 V100 FHHL V100 PCIe V100 PCIe 16 GB V100 PCIe 32 GB V100 SMX2 V100 SXM2 V100 SXM2 16 GB V100 SXM2 32 GB V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro Vega 16 Pro Vega 20 Pro Vega 48 Pro Vega 56 Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with Radeon Pro Vega 16, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018, $8,999
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
45.15
+293%

GV100 outperforms Pro 16 by a whopping 293% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
Pro Vega 16 Pro Vega 16

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking94456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.17no data
Power efficiency13.9111.81
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGV100Vega 12
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 March 2018 (8 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed1132 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate520.676.16
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32064
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache10 MB256 KB
L2 Cache6 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GV100 45.15
+293%
Pro Vega 16 11.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 18623
+287%
Samples: 40
Pro Vega 16 4809
Samples: 2

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro GV100 148580
+724%
Pro Vega 16 18035

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro GV100 139526
+539%
Pro Vega 16 21832

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD230−240
+290%
59
−290%
4K140−150
+268%
38
−268%

Cost per frame, $

1080p39.13no data
4K64.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
+0%
27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and Pro Vega 16 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 290% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 268% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 45.15 11.50
Recency 27 March 2018 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 293% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 233% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 16 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
Pro Vega 16 Radeon Pro Vega 16
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
P104-101 P104 101
vs
RTX 2070 Super RTX 2070 Super
P104-101 P104 101
vs
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
P104-101 P104 101
vs
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT
P104-101 P104 101
vs
RTX 5080 Mobile RTX 5080 Mobile
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro V7300X Pro V7300X
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
R8 M435DX R8 M435DX
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
7050 PV + nForce 630a GeForce 7050 PV + nForce 630a
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 4000 RTX 4000
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 2080 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 55 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.