Quadro NVS 280 PCIe vs Tesla S2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF100NV37
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)25 May 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448 ×4no data
Core clock speed574 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14 ×41.100
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS ×4no data
ROPs48 ×44
TMUs56 ×44
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×464 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s ×48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 25 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 900 Watt 13 Watt

Tesla S2050 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCIe, on the other hand, has 6823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and Quadro NVS 280 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Quadro NVS 280 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S2050 or Quadro NVS 280 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.