Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Tesla S2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.46
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGF100DG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448 ×4768
Core clock speed574 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14 ×479.20
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS ×42.534 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×424
TMUs56 ×448
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×44 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×4128 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s ×468.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 900 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has an age advantage of 9 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 3500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and Iris Xe Graphics MAX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S2050 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 246 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S2050 or Iris Xe Graphics MAX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.