Tesla S2050 vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1407not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG98GF100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 $11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8448 ×4
Core clock speed540 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors210 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs448 ×4
TMUs856 ×4
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache16 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed695 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s148.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2009 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 900 Watt

NVS 295 has 3813% lower power consumption.

Tesla S2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 295 and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.