GeForce RTX 2070 vs Tesla S2050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated94
Place by popularitynot in top-10099
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data33.54
Power efficiencyno data16.67
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF100TU106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)17 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482304
Core clock speed574 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14233.3
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS7.465 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs56144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.07.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 17 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 900 Watt 175 Watt

RTX 2070 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 414.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and GeForce RTX 2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S2050 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 57 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3522 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.