Arc Pro A30M vs Tesla S2050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.88
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF100DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$11,999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481024
Core clock speed574 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)900 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14128.0
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs5664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed773 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth148.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 900 Watt 50 Watt

Arc Pro A30M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S2050 and Arc Pro A30M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S2050 is a workstation card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S2050
Tesla S2050
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 57 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.