GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Tesla P40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla P40 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Tesla P40
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.50
+83%

Tesla P40 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tesla P40 Tesla P40
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.44no data
Power efficiency8.3622.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 September 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38401024
Core clock speed1303 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate367.476.80
Floating-point processing power11.76 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1808 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth347.1 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla P40 30.50
+83%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla P40 11751
+83%
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6422

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+75.4%
57
−75.4%
1440p60−65
+76.5%
34
−76.5%
4K40−45
+81.8%
22
−81.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p56.99no data
1440p94.98no data
4K142.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+0%
49
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+0%
38
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hitman 3 45
+0%
45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+0%
202
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hitman 3 43
+0%
43
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
+0%
62
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 193
+0%
193
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+0%
19
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+0%
12
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
+0%
22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Hitman 3 38
+0%
38
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+0%
57
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
+0%
54
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
+0%
16
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 46
+0%
46
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+0%
12
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 25
+0%
25
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
+0%
130
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 14
+0%
14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
+0%
5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+0%
21
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Tesla P40 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • Tesla P40 is 75% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla P40 is 76% faster in 1440p
  • Tesla P40 is 82% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.50 16.67
Recency 13 September 2016 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Tesla P40 has a 83% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Tesla P40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla P40 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla P40
Tesla P40
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
vs
RX 590 GME Radeon RX 590 GME
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
ATI 9200 PCI Radeon 9200 PCI
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
ATI 9800 XT Radeon 9800 XT
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
RX 6900 Radeon RX 6900
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
Tesla C2070 Tesla C2070
Quadro M4000 Quadro M4000
vs
R9 370 Radeon R9 370

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 192 votes

Rate Tesla P40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.