GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps T400 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.80

1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms P102-100 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P102-100 P102-100
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking561372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Power efficiency2.4224.08
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32001024
Core clock speed1582 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate336.676.80
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS2.458 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs20064
L1 Cache1.2 MB1 MB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 7.80
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 15.54
+99.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 3300
Samples: 4
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6578
+99.3%
Samples: 633

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−100%
54
+100%
1440p16−18
−106%
33
+106%
4K12−14
−100%
24
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.19no data
1440p37.44no data
4K49.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
+0%
25
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how P102-100 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 100% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 106% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.80 15.54
Recency 12 February 2018 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

P102-100 has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 99.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
P102-100 P102 100
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
R7 M365X AMD Radeon R7 M365X
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
R7 A360 AMD Radeon R7 A360
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
R7 A360 AMD Radeon R7 A360
vs
RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
Pro Vega II Pro Vega II
P102-100 NVIDIA P102 100
vs
A2 A2
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7970 GHz Edition HD 7970 GHz Edition
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
GT 120 OEM GT 120 OEM
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
6600 VE GeForce 6600 VE
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
RTX 3070 Ti RTX 3070 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 238 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.