Quadro P4200 vs Tesla P4

Place in performance ranking	228	196
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	50.77	7.56
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	GP104
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 September 2016 (7 years ago)	7 May 2018 (5 years ago)
Current price	$92	$1526

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla P4 has 572% better value for money than Quadro P4200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	2304
Core clock speed	886 MHz	1215 MHz
Boost clock speed	1114 MHz	1480 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	178.2	237.2
Floating-point performance	5,443 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla P4 and Quadro P4200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	7132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla P4 22.65

Quadro P4200 25.06
+10.6%

Quadro P4200 outperforms Tesla P4 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla P4 8767

Quadro P4200 10586
+20.7%

Quadro P4200 outperforms Tesla P4 by 21% in Passmark.