Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Tesla P100 DGXS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP100Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 April 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584448
Core clock speed1328 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate331.5no data
Floating-point processing power10.61 gflopsno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs224no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1430 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2016 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 7 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P100 DGXS and Radeon RX Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P100 DGXS is a workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Radeon RX Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4860 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.