TITAN RTX vs Tesla M60

Place in performance ranking	268	56
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.82	11.33
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GM204	TU102
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2015 (8 years ago)	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499
Current price	$81	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN RTX has 45% better value for money than Tesla M60.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	4608
Core clock speed	557 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	150.8	509.8
Floating-point performance	2x 4,833 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	5.2	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla M60 19.55

TITAN RTX 48.83
+150%

TITAN RTX outperforms Tesla M60 by 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla M60 7551

TITAN RTX 18858
+150%

TITAN RTX outperforms Tesla M60 by 150% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60−65 −163%	158 +163%
1440p	40−45 −160%	104 +160%
4K	30−35 −153%	76 +153%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

−163%

79
+163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −160%	104 +160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −160%	104 +160%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −161%	209 +161%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 −160%	143 +160%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −163%	79 +163%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −154%	127 +154%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −151%	201 +151%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −167%	187 +167%
Hitman 3	45−50 −160%	117 +160%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −155%	332 +155%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −162%	144 +162%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −154%	127 +154%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −151%	351 +151%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −180%	112 +180%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −171%	95 +171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −151%	88 +151%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −154%	203 +154%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −162%	131 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −163%	79 +163%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −153%	101 +153%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −157%	154 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −154%	254 +154%
Hitman 3	35−40 −169%	94 +169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 −158%	336 +158%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −174%	137 +174%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −152%	126 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −160%	286 +160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −167%	267 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −155%	204 +155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −163%	79 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −167%	80 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −155%	102 +155%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −160%	78 +160%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −163%	79 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −150%	175 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −156%	218 +156%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −155%	242 +155%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −153%	139 +153%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −187%	86 +187%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
−173%

123

+173%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −180%	95−100 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −162%	144 +162%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −157%	50−55 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −175%	66 +175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −171%	122 +171%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −175%	66 +175%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −168%	134 +168%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −162%	157 +162%
Hitman 3	40−45 −150%	100 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −158%	168 +158%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −153%	114 +153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −161%	183 +161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −157%	75−80 +157%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −159%	70 +159%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
−164%

119

+164%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −151%	88 +151%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −179%	67 +179%
Hitman 3	18−20 −167%	48 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −175%	65−70 +175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −175%	66 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −158%	103 +158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −189%	52 +189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −169%	43 +169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −178%	50 +178%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −175%	33 +175%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −172%	49 +172%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −153%	114 +153%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −155%	102 +155%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −173%	82 +173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −169%	43 +169%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−174%

74
+174%

This is how Tesla M60 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

TITAN RTX is 163% faster in 1080p
TITAN RTX is 160% faster in 1440p
TITAN RTX is 153% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.55	48.83
Recency	30 August 2015	18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	280 Watt