Radeon IGP 320M vs Tesla M60

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	269	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.82	no data
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GM204	RS100
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	30 August 2015 (8 years ago)	5 October 2002 (21 year ago)
Current price	$81	$184

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2
Core clock speed	557 MHz	2 MHz
Boost clock speed	1178 MHz	160 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	150.8	0.16
Floating-point performance	2x 4,833 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla M60 and Radeon IGP 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	30 August 2015	5 October 2002
Chip lithography	28 nm	180 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---