Radeon RX 5500 vs Tesla M6

Place in the ranking	344	258
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.08	14.22
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM204	Navi 14
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2015 (9 years ago)	7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1408
Core clock speed	930 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz	1845 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	110 Watt
Texture fill rate	113.3	162.4
Floating-point processing power	3.625 TFLOPS	5.196 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	96	88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	180 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	-
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla M6 13.92

RX 5500 19.65
+41.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla M6 6226

RX 5500 8788
+41.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.92	19.65
Recency	30 August 2015	7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	110 Watt

Tesla M6 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 10% lower power consumption.

RX 5500, on the other hand, has a 41.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M6 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M6 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop one.