Quadro T500 Mobile vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2090 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2090
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
8.78
+6.4%

M2090 outperforms T500 Mobile by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking530548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7035.20
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speed651 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6694.92
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6456
L1 Cache1 MB896 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
1440p14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
4K18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Tesla M2090 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 7% faster in 1440p
  • Tesla M2090 is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.78 8.25
Recency 25 July 2011 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 18 Watt

Tesla M2090 has a 6.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1288.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tesla M2090 and Quadro T500 Mobile.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
P104-100 P104 100
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
GRID M6-8Q M6-8Q
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
T1000 Max-Q T1000 Max-Q
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RX 550 512SP 550 512SP
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
T600 Mobile T600 Mobile
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RTX 3060 8 GB GA104 3060 8 GB GA104
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB 3050 6 GB
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 10 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2090 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.