Quadro T500 Mobile vs Quadro 7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 7000 with Quadro T500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 7000
2012, $14,499
6 GB GDDR5, 204 Watt
8.38
+1.6%

7000 outperforms T500 Mobile by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1535.18
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date2 May 2012 (13 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$14,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512896
Core clock speed651 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6694.92
Floating-point processing power1.3322 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6456
L1 Cache896 KB896 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed851 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth163.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
1440p14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
4K16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p414.26no data
1440p1035.64no data
4K906.19no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Quadro 7000 and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 7% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.38 8.25
Recency 2 May 2012 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro 7000 has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1033.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 7000 and Quadro T500 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro 7000 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro T500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Quadro 7000
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
GRID K520 GRID K520
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6-8Q
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
RX 6400 RX 6400
Quadro 7000 Quadro 7000
vs
RTX 4090 D RTX 4090 D
Tesla K10 Tesla K10
vs
GTX 275 PhysX Edition GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Tesla K10 Tesla K10
vs
GTX 285 Mac Edition GTX 285 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 113 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 7000 or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.