Quadro 5010M vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000M 2000M 3000M 3000M X2 4000M 5000M 5010M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2090 with Quadro 5010M, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2090
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
8.73
+117%

M2090 outperforms 5010M by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
Quadro 5010M Quadro 5010M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking530732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.693.10
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF110GF110
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed651 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6621.60
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6448
L1 Cache1 MB768 KB
L2 Cache768 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.02.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p80−85
+111%
38
−111%
Full HD120−130
+103%
59
−103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Tesla M2090 and Quadro 5010M compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M2090 is 111% faster in 900p
  • Tesla M2090 is 103% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.73 4.02
Recency 25 July 2011 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

Tesla M2090 has a 117.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro 5010M, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5010M in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Quadro 5010M Quadro 5010M
vs
FirePro M4000 FirePro M4000
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
Tesla M2070-Q Tesla M2070-Q
vs
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Xe Graphics MAX
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 4800 Mac Edition
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
GMA X3100 GMA X3100
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU Max 24-Core GPU
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
HD Graphics 3000 Graphics 3000
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Quadro K420 Quadro K420
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
GRID K100 GRID K100
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Tesla S2050 Tesla S2050
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
ATI 7000 Mac Edition Radeon 7000 Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 9 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2090 or Quadro 5010M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.