HD Graphics 510 vs Tesla M2090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 505 510 515 520 530

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla M2090 with HD Graphics 510, including specs and performance data.

Tesla M2090
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
8.78
+489%

M2090 outperforms HD Graphics 510 by a whopping 489% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5361028
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.707.65
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGF110Skylake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed651 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6610.80
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs483
TMUs6412
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed924 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 46 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.78 1.49
Recency 25 July 2011 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Tesla M2090 has a 489% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 433% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 1567% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2090 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 510 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4850 Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
T400 T400
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
RTX 2060 12 GB RTX 2060 12 GB
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
R9 390X2 R9 390X2
Tesla M2075 Tesla M2075
vs
Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 384SP Mobile
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
HD 7660G HD 7660G
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
GTX 675M SLI GTX 675M SLI
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
HD 6990M HD 6990M
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
Go 7400 Go 7400
Tesla M2090 Tesla M2090
vs
HD 7470A HD 7470A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 420 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2090 or HD Graphics 510, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.