RTX TITAN Ada Generation vs Tesla M2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110AD102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44818432
Core clock speed574 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate32.141,452
Floating-point processing power1.028 gflops92.9 gflops
ROPs48192
TMUs56576

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm336 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed3132 MHz24 GB/s
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s1,152 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 800 Watt

Tesla M2075 has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX TITAN Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2075 and RTX TITAN Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2075 is a workstation graphics card while RTX TITAN Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada Generation
RTX TITAN Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 20 votes

Rate RTX TITAN Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.