Playstation 3 RSX vs Tesla M10

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking504not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.68no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGM107RSX-CXD2991
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)11 November 2006 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1033 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt81 Watt
Texture fill rate52.24no data
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 May 2016 11 November 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 81 Watt

Tesla M10 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M10 and Playstation 3 RSX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M10 is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 3 RSX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
Playstation 3 RSX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 79 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.