GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Tesla K8
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla K8 with GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, including specs and performance data.
760 Ti OEM outperforms K8 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 519 | 418 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.96 | 5.90 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 September 2014 (11 years ago) | 27 September 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 693 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 811 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 103.8 | 109.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.491 TFLOPS | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.98 | 12.94 |
| Recency | 16 September 2014 | 27 September 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 170 Watt |
Tesla K8 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 70% lower power consumption.
GTX 760 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 44.1% higher aggregate performance score.
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K8 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla K8 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
