GeForce GTX 760 vs Tesla K8

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K2 K220Q K240Q K260Q K280Q K520 Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K8 with GeForce GTX 760, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K8
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.18

GTX 760 outperforms Tesla K8 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
GTX 760 GTX 760

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking487423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.28
Power efficiency6.594.95
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 September 2014 (10 years ago)25 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361152
Core clock speed693 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed811 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate103.899.07
Floating-point processing power2.491 TFLOPS2.378 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width1-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system powerno data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
PhysX-+
3D Vision Live-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.0+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla K8 9.18
GTX 760 11.73
+27.8%
  • Octane Render OctaneBench

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Tesla K8 38
GTX 760 44
+15.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−34%
67
+34%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.72

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Tesla K8 and GTX 760 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 34% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.18 11.73
Recency 16 September 2014 25 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 170 Watt

Tesla K8 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 70% lower power consumption.

GTX 760, on the other hand, has a 27.8% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 760 is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K8 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K8 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla K8
Tesla K8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150
GTX 760 GeForce GTX 760
vs
HD 7950 Radeon HD 7950
Tesla K8 Tesla K8
vs
T400 4 GB T400 4 GB
Quadro M6000 NVIDIA Quadro M6000
vs
MX570 A MX570 A
Quadro K1200 NVIDIA Quadro K1200
vs
HD Graphics 515 HD Graphics 515
Quadro K1200 NVIDIA Quadro K1200
vs
R7 350 640SP R7 350 640SP
Tesla K80m NVIDIA Tesla K80m
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Tesla K80m NVIDIA Tesla K80m
vs
GRID M6-8Q M6 8Q
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
HD 6990M Crossfire HD 6990M Crossfire
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
HD 7570 HD 7570
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
9600 GSO GeForce 9600 GSO
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
RX Vega Mobile RX Vega Mobile
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
RX Vega 24 Mobile RX Vega 24 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1
3 votes

Rate Tesla K8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
2214 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K8 or GeForce GTX 760, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.