NX-SoC vs Tesla K40m

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking493not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK110BGM20B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 November 2013 (10 years ago)17 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880256
Core clock speed745 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz768 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate210.212.29
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs24016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.55.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 17 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 15 Watt

Tesla K40m has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

NX-SoC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 1533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40m and NX-SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40m is a workstation card while NX-SoC is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Tesla K40m
NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 20 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.