GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Tesla K20c

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K20c with GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Tesla K20c
2012, $3,199
5 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
8.24

RTX 2080 Ti outperforms K20c by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54966
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1617.85
Power efficiency2.8115.80
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110TU102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)20 September 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,199 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 2080 Ti has 11056% better value for money than Tesla K20c.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24964352
Core clock speed706 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate146.8420.2
Floating-point processing power3.524 TFLOPS13.45 TFLOPS
ROPs4088
TMUs208272
Tensor Coresno data544
Ray Tracing Coresno data68
L1 Cache208 KB4.3 MB
L2 Cache1280 KB5.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB11 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit352 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth208.0 GB/s616.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.57.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−588%
165
+588%
1440p18−20
−572%
121
+572%
4K14−16
−557%
92
+557%

Cost per frame, $

1080p133.29
−2102%
6.05
+2102%
1440p177.72
−2053%
8.26
+2053%
4K228.50
−2004%
10.86
+2004%
  • RTX 2080 Ti has 2102% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti has 2053% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti has 2004% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 136
+0%
136
+0%
Fortnite 302
+0%
302
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 182
+0%
182
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 201
+0%
201
+0%
Valorant 285
+0%
285
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 164
+0%
164
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 232
+0%
232
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 181
+0%
181
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 193
+0%
193
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 247
+0%
247
+0%
Valorant 267
+0%
267
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+0%
168
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 191
+0%
191
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 259
+0%
259
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 216
+0%
216
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 266
+0%
266
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 134
+0%
134
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+0%
147
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 151
+0%
151
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270
+0%
270
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 142
+0%
142
+0%
Metro Exodus 51
+0%
51
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+0%
98
+0%
Valorant 259
+0%
259
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 73
+0%
73
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 88
+0%
88
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 79
+0%
79
+0%

This is how Tesla K20c and RTX 2080 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Ti is 588% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 572% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 557% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.24 51.44
Recency 12 November 2012 20 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 11 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

Tesla K20c has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Ti, on the other hand, has a 524.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 120% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla K20c in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla K20c is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20c
Tesla K20c
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 12 votes

Rate Tesla K20c on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4975 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K20c or GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.