ATI Radeon 8500 XT vs Tesla K20X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK110R250
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (11 years ago)1 June 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688no data
Core clock speed732 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate164.02.400
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs2248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth249.6 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 1 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 25 Watt

Tesla K20X has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 8500 XT, on the other hand, has 840% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20X and Radeon 8500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K20X is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 8500 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20X
Tesla K20X
ATI Radeon 8500 XT
Radeon 8500 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 51 vote

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.