Radeon RX 6850M XT vs Tesla C2075

Place in performance ranking	463	69
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.39	no data
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GF110	Navi 22
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$2237	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	2560
Core clock speed	574 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2463 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	145 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	413.0
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Tesla C2075 and Radeon RX 6850M XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	2.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla C2075 8.71

RX 6850M XT 44.52
+411%

Radeon RX 6850M XT outperforms Tesla C2075 by 411% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla C2075 3364

RX 6850M XT 17191
+411%

Radeon RX 6850M XT outperforms Tesla C2075 by 411% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −471%	137 +471%
1440p	16−18 −419%	83 +419%
4K	10−12 −470%	57 +470%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33
−433%

160

+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −443%	75−80 +443%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −430%	159 +430%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −426%	140−150 +426%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −456%	85−90 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −467%	136 +467%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −417%	90−95 +417%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −419%	100−110 +419%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −440%	160−170 +440%
Hitman 3	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −420%	180−190 +420%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −476%	120−130 +476%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −467%	100−110 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −440%	297 +440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −467%	119 +467%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −443%	75−80 +443%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −442%	130 +442%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −426%	140−150 +426%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −456%	85−90 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −489%	106 +489%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −417%	90−95 +417%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −419%	100−110 +419%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −440%	160−170 +440%
Hitman 3	16−18 −469%	90−95 +469%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −420%	180−190 +420%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −476%	120−130 +476%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −467%	100−110 +467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −418%	259 +418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −466%	198 +466%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −483%	100−110 +483%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −443%	75−80 +443%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −433%	112 +433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −456%	85−90 +456%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −444%	87 +444%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −417%	90−95 +417%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −440%	160−170 +440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −420%	180−190 +420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −468%	227 +468%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −481%	122 +481%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −419%	83 +419%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
−467%

100−110

+467%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −450%	85−90 +450%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −483%	100−110 +483%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −444%	45−50 +444%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −431%	85 +431%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −475%	65−70 +475%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −450%	55 +450%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −450%	99 +450%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −428%	95−100 +428%
Hitman 3	10−11 −490%	55−60 +490%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −450%	95−100 +450%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −413%	80−85 +413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −453%	166 +453%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −467%	65−70 +467%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −500%	60 +500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−450%

75−80
+450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −475%	45−50 +475%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Hitman 3	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −480%	55−60 +480%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −429%	35−40 +429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −414%	72 +414%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −417%	30−35 +417%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −422%	47 +422%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −420%	26 +420%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −425%	60−65 +425%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −480%	55−60 +480%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −433%	45−50 +433%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−413%

40−45

+413%

This is how Tesla C2075 and RX 6850M XT compete in popular games:

RX 6850M XT is 471% faster in 1080p
RX 6850M XT is 419% faster in 1440p
RX 6850M XT is 470% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.71	44.52
Recency	25 July 2011	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	247 Watt	145 Watt