Radeon RX 560 XT vs Tesla C2075
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 489 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.44 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Ellesmere |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 13 March 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 973 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1073 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 247 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 120.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.028 TFLOPS | 3.846 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 112 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 783 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | 211.2 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2011 | 13 March 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 247 Watt | 150 Watt |
Tesla C2075 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 560 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 64.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
