Radeon RX 560 XT vs Tesla M2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)13 March 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481792
Core clock speed574 MHz973 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1073 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14120.2
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS3.846 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs56112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s211.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 13 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 150 Watt

Tesla M2075 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 560 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2075 and Radeon RX 560 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla M2075 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
Radeon RX 560 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 262 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2075 or Radeon RX 560 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.