Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 7000 Quadro Plex 7000 C2075 C2090 M2075 M2090 X2070 X2090
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8610G 8610G IGP 8650G 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 8650M 8670A 8670M 8690M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla C2075 with Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

Tesla C2075
2011
6 GB GDDR5, 247 Watt
8.04
+232%

C2075 outperforms HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking554883
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.50no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF110no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)1 August 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448768
Core clock speed574 MHz720 / 775 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.14no data
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95−100
+228%
29
−228%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Tesla C2075 and HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Tesla C2075 is 228% faster in 900p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.04 2.42
Recency 25 July 2011 1 August 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

Tesla C2075 has a 232.2% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla C2075 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
vs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
Tesla C2050 Tesla C2050
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics HD 8550G + HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8690M HD 8690M
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
R6 M340DX R6 M340DX
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8650M HD 8650M
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8730M HD 8730M
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8670M HD 8670M
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8590M HD 8590M
Tesla C2075 Tesla C2075
vs
HD 8650G HD 8650G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650G HD 8670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.