Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs Tesla C2075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking541not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.48no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4484608
Core clock speed574 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)247 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate32.14449.3
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS14.38 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs56288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.07.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 247 Watt 260 Watt

Tesla C2075 has 5.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2075
Tesla C2075
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 29 votes

Rate Tesla C2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2075 or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.