FirePro W4000 vs Tesla C2050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking558not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.43no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Pitcairn
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (14 years ago)7 August 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448768
Core clock speed574 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)238 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1439.60
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs5648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length248 mm183 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 7 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 238 Watt 75 Watt

Tesla C2050 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro W4000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 217.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C2050 and FirePro W4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla C2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C2050 or FirePro W4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.