GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB vs Tesla C2075
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 553 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.50 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | GA107 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (14 years ago) | 6 July 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 652 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1207 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 8,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 247 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 96.56 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.028 TFLOPS | 6.18 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 248 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 783 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 July 2011 | 6 July 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 247 Watt | 45 Watt |
Tesla C2075 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 448.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla C2075 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla C2075 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
